The phrases "further research is needed" (FRIN), "more research is needed" and other variants are commonly used in research papers. The cliché is so common. 5 Conclusions and Further Research. Summary and Conclusions. In this thesis, methods have been presented for modeling of acoustic tubes by means of . Suggestions for further research. One single PhD research project is by nature restricted to what can be accomplished in four years time. An important result of.
For example, perhaps you focused on consumers rather than businesses , or Canada rather than the United Kingdom , or a more individualistic culture like the United States rather than a more collectivist culture like China. For example, there may be little value in future studies looking at different cultures if culture is not an important component underlying your conceptual framework or theoretical model. If you are not sure whether a new context, location or culture is more appropriate, or what new context, location or culture you should select, a review the literature will often help clarify where you focus should be.
Assuming that you have set out a conceptual framework or theoretical model and examined or tested it in the field , another series of future research suggestions comes out of expanding that conceptual framework or theoretical model.
We talk about a series of future research suggestions because there are so many ways that you can expand on your conceptual framework or theoretical model. For example, you can do this by:. Examining constructs or variables that were included in your conceptual framework or theoretical model but were not focused. Looking at a particular relationship aspect of your conceptual framework or theoretical model further.
Adding new constructs or variables to the conceptual framework or theoretical model you set out if justified by the literature. It would be possible to include one or a number of these as future research suggestions. Again, make sure that any suggestions you make have are justified , either by your findings or the literature. With the dissertation process at the undergraduate and master's level lasting between 3 and 9 months, a lot a can happen in between.
For example, a specific event e. Clearly, there is little you can do about this. However, if this happens, reflecting on it and re-evaluating your conceptual framework or theoretical model , as well as your findings, is an obvious source of future research suggestions. Addressing research limitations in your dissertation In the Research Limitations section of your Conclusions chapter, you will have inevitably detailed the potential flaws i. An inability to answer your research questions Theoretical and conceptual problems Limitations of your research strategy Problems of research quality Identifying what these research limitations were and proposing future research suggestions that address them is arguably the easiest and quickest ways to complete the Future Research section of your Conclusions chapter.
Building on a particular finding or aspect of your research Often, the findings from your dissertation research will highlight a number of new avenues that could be explored in future studies. Given the continuing evolution of airport sustainability practices, a second phase of this work could allow for the entry of additional practices into SAGA. Further research into specific practice types, such as integration of sustainability in winter operations, may also be warranted. In particular, additional research into social sustainability initiatives could be useful in addressing some of the constraints faced by airports in implementing such efforts, such as prohibitions on donation of public goods.
Finally, the SAGA website could benefit from additional resources to provide expanded learning opportunities on topics of special and emerging interest, such as climate resilience. The SAGA website was developed to assist airport operators in developing sustainability programs and provide guidance to those who have new data to input. However, a large percentage of these entries do not contain actual practice data. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.
Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book. To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter. Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available. Do you enjoy reading reports from the Academies online for free?
Sign up for email notifications and we'll let you know about new publications in your areas of interest when they're released. Some research journals have banned the phrase "more research is needed" on the grounds that it is redundant;  it is almost always true and fits almost any article, and so can be taken as understood. The presence of FRIN had no correlation with the strength of the evidence against the medical intervention.
Authors who thought a treatment was useless were just as likely to recommend researching it further. Indeed, authors may recommend "further research" when, given the existing evidence, further research would be extremely unlikely to be approved by an ethics committee. Studies finding that a treatment has no noticeable effects are sometimes greeted with statements that "more research is needed" by those convinced that the treatment is effective, but the effect has not yet been found.
She has also described FRIN as "an indicator that serious scholarly thinking on the topic has ceased", saying that "it is almost never the only logical conclusion that can be drawn from a set of negative, ambiguous, incomplete or contradictory data. Academic journal editors were banning unqualified FRIN statements as early as , requiring more specific information such as what types of research were needed, and what questions they ought to address.
Greenhalgh suggests that, because vague FRIN statements are an argument that "tomorrow's research investments should be pitched into precisely the same patch of long grass as yesterday's", funding should be refused to those making them.
She and others argue that more thought and research is needed into methods for determining where more research is needed. Both the needfulness and needlessness of further research may be overlooked. The blobbogram leading this article is from an iconic systematic review ; it shows clinical trials of the use of corticosteroids to hasten lung development in pregnancies where a baby is likely to be born prematurely.
Further research is needed
This is because your future research suggestions generally arise out of the research limitations you have identified in your own dissertation. In this article, we . There are limitations to all sampling strategies and to qualitative research, in particular. The strength of this method was that the sample selection used input. The initially stated overarching aim of this research was to identify the contextual factors and mechanisms that are regularly associated with effective and.